Requirements to Reviewed Test Cases
Upload or maintain requirement documents, generate candidate test cases, inspect AI quality controls, approve or reject outputs, and preserve human-edited changes.
A searchable guide for using Orlithic QA Console to manage requirements, generate AI-assisted test cases, review quality signals, run manual QA cycles, test APIs, track bugs, inspect diagnostics, and prepare release decisions.
Search this guide instantly, then export the current documentation as HTML, Word-compatible DOC, or Markdown.
Orlithic QA Console is a QA workspace for controlled pilot teams that need a single place to manage requirements, generate and review AI-assisted test cases, run manual QA cycles, test APIs, track bugs, inspect diagnostics, and use contextual AI support.
Core data is stored through workspace-aware APIs backed by PostgreSQL.
Generate tests, inspect quality signals, and use AI analysis with human review gates.
Trace requirements, approve generated tests, link bugs, and inspect release readiness.
Upload or maintain requirement documents, generate candidate test cases, inspect AI quality controls, approve or reject outputs, and preserve human-edited changes.
Create test cycles and runs, add selected test cases, execute statuses, save actual results and evidence, then create linked bugs from failed run items.
Build collections, configure environments, run API requests through the backend queue, review assertions, inspect response intelligence, and link API requests to test cases or bugs.
Use the dashboard to inspect requirement coverage, approved tests, cycle progress, blocked and failed results, open high-severity bugs, stale cases, security findings, and deterministic release-risk reasons.
Store requirements, folders, document versions, original uploads, parsing jobs, and smart refresh previews for changed requirement sections.
Generate, import, review, deduplicate, approve, reject, organize, and execute test cases with source requirement context.
Map requirements to tests, API requests, runs, bugs, source documents, and automation changes so gaps are visible before release.
Create linked defects, attach run evidence, track lifecycle state, and preserve context from failed test execution.
Review operational events, worker health, audit logs, failed jobs, API queue recovery, limits, storage, and workspace members.
Use contextual AI assistance tied to workspace documents and app state, with index health and retry controls available for admins.
Current workspace data is backed by PostgreSQL and workspace-scoped APIs. Authentication is implemented with Clerk-aware middleware and server-side user resolution, with RBAC enforced across workspace routes.
Low-risk UI preferences and draft-only values may still use browser storage. Treat the current product as a controlled pilot: core workflows are backend-backed, while advanced enterprise hardening continues incrementally.
Object storage is available for original documents, evidence files, bug attachments, and API binary references. A dedicated antivirus scanner workflow remains a future production-hardening item for untrusted uploads.
It is a QA workspace for requirements documents, AI-assisted test generation, structured imports, API testing, automation review, bug tracking, diagnostics, release readiness, and contextual AI chat.
Yes. Core workspace data uses PostgreSQL and workspace-scoped APIs. A few low-risk UI preferences and draft-only values may still remain in browser storage.
Yes. AI-generated cases carry confidence scores, source requirement references, quality flags, review status, and human-edited tracking so reviewers can approve or reject them before execution.
Yes. API collections, requests, environments, queued runs, response intelligence, assertions, linked bugs, and reports are supported through backend-backed API Testing flows.
Admins should review usage limits, workspace members, audit logs, operational events, worker health, RAG index health, failed jobs, API queue recovery, and storage status.
Yes. Use the export buttons at the top of the page to download this guide as HTML, Word-compatible DOC, or Markdown.
For pilot teams, start with a small workspace, upload a representative requirement document, generate a limited test set, review AI quality signals, run a manual test cycle, and inspect release readiness before broad rollout.